Filament Brand: GEEETECH

On this page, you will find basic statistics and information about the "GEEETECH" brand of 3D printing filaments. Do you see any issue or mistake? Do you want to add your experience with this brand? Lets talk!

The tables below display the quantities, prices, and user ratings of the individual materials in our database. To ensure the information remains as current as possible, only products data downloaded from Amazon websites in the last three days are shown.

Amazon.com Price ($) per kg Ratings
Material Count Min Avg Max Avg
PLA 23 $19.99 $24.34 $35.99 4.3 / 5.0
All 23
Show all GEEETECH discounts
Amazon.de Price (€) per kg Ratings
Material Count Min Avg Max Avg
ABS 16 €14.99 €21.18 €21.99 4.3 / 5.0
PLA 49 €15.99 €24.51 €38.99 4.3 / 5.0
All 65
Show all GEEETECH discounts

Review Analysis

Last updated: May 20, 2024. This is an AI-generated analysis of user reviews available on Amazon marketplaces. The final text is always reviewed by a human. Do you notice any issues or mistakes? Would you like to share your experience as well? Lets talk!

Summary

The GEEETECH brand of 3D printing filaments receives generally favorable reviews with some critical feedback. The quality and performance of their PLA, PLA-W, ABS, and PETG filaments vary, with the PLA filaments being the most frequently reviewed. The core strengths of GEEETECH filaments are their consistent quality, good layer adhesion, and excellent packaging. However, users have reported occasional issues such as clogging, filament winding problems, and adherence inconsistencies.

Positive Aspects

  1. Consistent Quality of PLA Filament: Many users praise the print quality and consistency of GEEETECH's PLA filaments, highlighting their ease of use and good layer adhesion [#1, #2, #3].
  2. Strong ABS Filament Performance: Users note that GEEETECH’s ABS and ABS+ filaments demonstrate high durability and stability in prints, making them suitable for functional parts [#4, #5, #6].
  3. Good PETG Filament Reviews: PETG filaments are also well-received, noted for minimal stringing and smooth layer adhesion [#7, #8].
  4. Aesthetic Appearance: Many reviewers appreciate the aesthetic and polished final appearance of their prints, particularly with the Silk PLA variants [#9, #10, #11].
  5. Reliable Packaging: GEEETECH filaments come well-packaged, with vacuum-sealed bags and included silica gel packs, reducing moisture issues [#12, #13, #14].

Negative Aspects

  1. Filament Clogging Issues: Some users reported that certain GEEETECH filament variants, especially the wood filaments, tend to clog nozzles [#15, #16, #17].
  2. Inconsistent Winding: Several reviews flagged issues with the winding of the filament, causing tangling or uneven feeding [#11, #18, #19].
  3. Dimensional Variability: A few users experienced issues with filament diameter consistency, which led to print failures or nozzle clogs [#14, #20].
  4. Adherence Problems: Some users faced adhesion problems with GEEETECH filaments, especially when using ABS [#3, #21].
  5. Low Luminance in Glow Filaments: The glow-in-the-dark filaments were criticized for their low glow intensity [#22, #23].

Detailed Observations

  • PLA Filaments: Users generally reported smooth extrusion and stable prints. The bone white color received mixed reviews due to its non-matte finish [#24, #25].
  • ABS and ABS+ Filaments: While praised for durability, the ABS filaments require careful handling to avoid warping and require proper ventilation due to odor emissions. Issues with poor winding were prevalent [#8, #26].
  • PETG Filaments: Users enjoyed strong layer adhesion and minimal stringing. There were isolated cases of clogging when nearing the end of spools [#27, #28].
  • Wood Filaments: Despite their aesthetic appeal, wood filaments often caused nozzle clogs. Users had to experiment with temperatures to prevent issues [#15, #16].
  • Silk PLA Filaments: These offered excellent aesthetics and smooth finishes. They were particularly well-received for their metal-like sheen [#10, #17].
  • Glow-in-the-Dark Filaments: Reviews indicated that these filaments did not meet expectations in terms of luminance duration and intensity [#22, #23].

References