Filament Brand: ANYCUBIC

On this page, you will find basic statistics and information about the "ANYCUBIC" brand of 3D printing filaments. Do you see any issue or mistake? Do you want to add your experience with this brand? Lets talk!

The tables below display the quantities, prices, and user ratings of the individual materials in our database. To ensure the information remains as current as possible, only products data downloaded from Amazon websites in the last three days are shown.

Amazon.com Price ($) per kg Ratings
Material Count Min Avg Max Avg
ABS 1 $25.99 4.2 / 5.0
ASA 4 $25.99 $25.99 $25.99 4.2 / 5.0
PLA 15 $14.99 $23.98 $39.99 4.4 / 5.0
All 20
Show all ANYCUBIC discounts
Amazon.de Price (€) per kg Ratings
Material Count Min Avg Max Avg
ASA 5 €25.99 €30.39 €35.00 4.5 / 5.0
PETG 17 €17.50 €21.18 €30.00 4.5 / 5.0
PLA 28 €16.98 €25.19 €31.99 4.5 / 5.0
PLAP 7 €20.00 €22.28 €24.99 4.6 / 5.0
All 57
Show all ANYCUBIC discounts

Review Analysis

Last updated: April 12, 2024. This is an AI-generated analysis of user reviews available on Amazon marketplaces. The final text is always reviewed by a human. Do you notice any issues or mistakes? Would you like to share your experience as well? Lets talk!

Summary

Review analysis of ANYCUBIC brand PLA and PLA+ filaments exhibits a general leaning towards positive feedback across various Amazon marketplaces. Notable strengths include print quality and compatibility with diverse printer models, while prevailing detractions are centered around specific batch inconsistencies and filament handling issues. Data from more than 6000 global user ratings indicates a predominant distribution of 5-star reviews, signifying high customer satisfaction.

Positive Aspects

  • High overall customer satisfaction, with 74% of reviews at a 5-star rating.
  • Users often commend the print quality, especially in terms of the smoothness and precision of the final prints [#1, #2].
  • Compatibility with a range of ANYCUBIC's 3D printers is frequently highlighted, assuring buyers of the product’s integration with their existing hardware [#3].
  • Reports of effective customer service contribute positively to the brand’s reputation [#2].

Negative Aspects

  • Consistency across different filament batches appears to be a critical issue, as highlighted in multiple reviews where users experienced significant variability in quality [#4, #5].
  • Malfunction issues such as clogging and poor adhesion have led to considerable frustration, with some users reporting the need to switch back to previously used brands [#6, #7].
  • Complaints about filament tangling and poor spool winding causing disruptions during the printing process were noted, which often led to wasted material and time [#8].

Detailed Observations

  • The filaments have shown a tendency for good layer adhesion and low warping when they perform as expected [#9, #10].
  • Some reviewers noted the filament's propensity to become brittle and snap, particularly when left idle in the printer for extended periods [#11].
  • Quality seems to diverge notably between colors and batches, with black and white filaments frequently cited in both positive and negative contexts [#12, #13].

Recommendations for User

  1. Test Small Quantities First: Given the variability in filament quality, it is advisable for users to purchase smaller quantities initially to test compatibility with their specific printer models and settings.
  2. Monitor the Printing Process: Particularly with new spools, closely monitoring the first few prints can prevent material wastage due to tangling or other issues.
  3. Storage Solutions: Implementing proper storage solutions such as dry boxes or vacuum-sealed containers could mitigate issues related to filament brittleness and moisture absorption.
  4. Advanced Settings Optimization: Users encountering adhesion issues might benefit from experimenting with different bed temperatures, print speeds, and layer heights based on their specific printer’s capabilities.
  5. Regularly Check Reviews: Staying updated with recent reviews could provide insights into batch quality ahead of purchases, allowing users to make informed decisions based on the latest consumer experiences.

By adhering to these strategies, users can better manage the anticipated variability in filament quality and achieve more consistent print outcomes with ANYCUBIC filaments.

References